Comments on: Gratuitous Violence https://www.peoplevstate.com/?p=1098 fairly undermining public confidence in the administration of justice Sat, 07 Jan 2012 22:07:48 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.15 By: Sound familiar? | People v. State https://www.peoplevstate.com/?p=1098&cpage=1#comment-2489 Sat, 07 Jan 2012 22:07:48 +0000 http://www.peoplevstate.com/?p=1098#comment-2489 […] and premeditated violence that is gratuitous and unnecessary is madness. It was Loughner’s madness. It is the State’s […]

]]>
By: The Longstanding and Forgotten Rule of Lenity | People v. State https://www.peoplevstate.com/?p=1098&cpage=1#comment-2305 Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:46:19 +0000 http://www.peoplevstate.com/?p=1098#comment-2305 […] A logical corollary of the Rule of Lenity is that constitutional and common-law rights should be liberally construed. Coincidentally, Judge May was in the majority in the Court of Appeals decision that would have freed Tyrus Coleman, an innocent man, on Double Jeopardy grounds. Tragically, the Indiana Supreme Court didn’t see things her way. […]

]]>
By: Honor Where Honor Is Due | People v. State https://www.peoplevstate.com/?p=1098&cpage=1#comment-2243 Sat, 05 Nov 2011 03:15:17 +0000 http://www.peoplevstate.com/?p=1098#comment-2243 […] the craziest thing I do on this blog, and the thing most likely to get me disbarred, is openly criticize judges. A couple friends and family members have wondered at some of the things I’ve written, and […]

]]>
By: “I would not ignore Smith’s plight and choose her case as a fit opportunity to teach the Ninth Circuit a lesson.” | People v. State https://www.peoplevstate.com/?p=1098&cpage=1#comment-2233 Mon, 31 Oct 2011 19:10:10 +0000 http://www.peoplevstate.com/?p=1098#comment-2233 […] The dissenters essentially accuse the majority of Gratuitous Violence. […]

]]>
By: The Indiana Supreme Court’s done it again - | People v. State https://www.peoplevstate.com/?p=1098&cpage=1#comment-1855 Fri, 01 Jul 2011 22:54:37 +0000 http://www.peoplevstate.com/?p=1098#comment-1855 […] – reversing the Indiana Court of Appeals to reinstate a criminal conviction for no good reason (as they also recently did in Barnes and Coleman). […]

]]>