Comments on: Schirach on Crime https://www.peoplevstate.com/?p=2134 fairly undermining public confidence in the administration of justice Sun, 12 Jan 2014 06:55:05 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.4.15 By: Tobias https://www.peoplevstate.com/?p=2134&cpage=1#comment-4979 Sun, 12 Jan 2014 06:55:05 +0000 http://www.peoplevstate.com/?p=2134#comment-4979 Just read the book now. With DST, Boheim’s watch should really have said 16.26 rather than 14.26. You turn back the clock! Boheim was clever but his laywer even more so.

]]>
By: John Kindley https://www.peoplevstate.com/?p=2134&cpage=1#comment-3073 Wed, 23 May 2012 22:43:38 +0000 http://www.peoplevstate.com/?p=2134#comment-3073 In reply to Martin Budden.

The possibility that not only Schmied forgot (or intentionally “forgot”) but also the maid forgot to set her watch batch is in intriguing possibility. But, although I don’t have the book in front of me, didn’t she immediately call the security and the police when she discovered the body? And I’m sure they arrived shortly. Therefore, it seems very likely that the time reported for her discovery of the body was accurate given these corroborations. But I’ll have to look at the story again.

]]>
By: Martin Budden https://www.peoplevstate.com/?p=2134&cpage=1#comment-3055 Mon, 21 May 2012 06:07:37 +0000 http://www.peoplevstate.com/?p=2134#comment-3055 I’ve just realized there is another possibility. My first interpretation was a rather convoluted one which I’ll explain in more detail below. But there’s a simpler one which I have just realized: what if the maid forget to set her watch back? She wrote on the work sheet that she entered the room at 3:26pm. But if she had forgotten to put her watch back, then the actual time would have been 2:26pm. I now think that this is this possibility that Schmied realizes several months after the trial.

Here’s my initial convoluted explanation (which is still possible, but Occam’s razor leads me to favor the maid theory): There are two possibilities for the in time between Boheim’s watch and the video camera time:

1) (The story as directly told) Boheim is innocent. The clock on the video camera was not turned back and Boheim had turned back his watch. He left the hotel at 2:26.

2) (The hidden plot twist) Boheim is guilty. He planned the perfect murder. He deliberately turned his watch back *two* hours so that it would bring into doubt the accuracy of the clock on the video camera. He new his lawyer was good and cooly relied on the fact that his lawyer would be smart enough to discover the time discrepancy.

My initial interpretation of the final paragraph was that Schmied had realized that (2) was a possibility. But, as I said, I now think it was just that Schmied realized that the maid’s could have forgotten to set her watch back.

]]>
By: John Kindley https://www.peoplevstate.com/?p=2134&cpage=1#comment-3051 Sun, 20 May 2012 19:36:24 +0000 http://www.peoplevstate.com/?p=2134#comment-3051 In reply to Martin Budden.

I figured that the time on Boheim’s watch could be explained by the fact that since everybody’s clock had just recently changed he had simply forgotten to change his. But this doesn’t explain or refute the defense attorney’s argument that the time shown on the video camera demonstrated, given the clock change, that he had in fact left the hotel at 2:30 rather than 3:30.

]]>
By: Martin Budden https://www.peoplevstate.com/?p=2134&cpage=1#comment-3050 Sun, 20 May 2012 19:05:23 +0000 http://www.peoplevstate.com/?p=2134#comment-3050 Final paragraph of “Summertime”. My interpretation is this: several months after the trial Schmied (the prosecutor) realizes that the discrepancy between the time on the video camera and the time on Boheim’s watch could be explained by the fact that Boheim could have set his watch to the wrong time. So the suggestion is not that the defense attorney pulled a fast one, rather it is that Boheim planned the murder so well that he fooled everybody.

I think the stories are great. But the translation is awful.

]]>