Of course your comment on this was more than welcome, and not unwelcome on the ground that you haven’t had the time to study Stirner or Juenger extensively. It gave me an excuse to write a post. Stirner is indeed a “dangerous” thinker, arguably satanic — but only arguably. Juenger, perhaps half-ironically, implied he was a saint. The truth lies on a razor’s edge, if one cares to attempt to formulate it. Perhaps it’s more readily grasped in simplicity. As a relatively short introduction to Juenger, I can highly recommend this: http://anteckningar.wordpress.com/2007/06/05/der-waldgang-excerpter/

I may not have time in the near term, but this is interesting stuff.