{"id":1259,"date":"2011-09-06T01:29:24","date_gmt":"2011-09-06T05:29:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.peoplevstate.com\/?p=1259"},"modified":"2011-11-13T15:32:48","modified_gmt":"2011-11-13T19:32:48","slug":"on-being-called","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.peoplevstate.com\/?p=1259","title":{"rendered":"On Being Called"},"content":{"rendered":"
Jeff Gamso has a post up today<\/a> noting the addition of a few blogs to his blogroll. He also notes: “I should probably consider deleting a couple of blogs from the list, but it seems wiser to add.\u00a0 Because you never know.” I don’t have any reason to think my blog was one of those he had in mind for possible deletion (there’s several blogs on his roll that seem not to have been updated in some time), but it did cross my mind, and its crossing of my mind prompts me to ask myself once again what I’m doing, both on this blog and with my life in general.<\/p>\n I have a great deal of respect for Jeff. He’s been a great help to me on a couple of occasions with real life legal matters, once by phone and on another occasion by email. He’s encouraged me to hang in there when I’ve expressed readiness to throw in the towel. Beyond that, although we’ve sharply disagreed and traded barbs online on several occasions, and he’s come close to calling me an idiot, and probably close to half of my comments on his blog are critical (personally, I’ve always believed that thoughtful, critical comments are the most valuable), he continues to engage me, which is more than I can say for more than one blogger with whom I’ve also sharply disagreed and traded barbs.<\/p>\n I recognize that this blog has evolved or devolved to a single and simple philosophical point, and that philosophy doesn’t lend itself to blogging. I see this as a perhaps regrettable manifestation of my lifelong Platonic impulse, a preference for the universal over the particular, which some might – not unreasonably – interpret as intellectual laziness. Many criminal defense blogs ably and interestingly chronicle on a daily or weekly basis the crimes of the criminal justice system. My message is simply that the intention of the State is not to fight crime but to perpetrate it.<\/p>\n A major theme of the so-called practical blawgosphere is the denigration of attorney advertising. The true professional, although he earns his living by his profession, is not motivated by filthy lucre. He’s not an ambulance chaser. I’ve always appreciated this sentiment. I’m warming to it more and more. The legal profession is not a job like other jobs. It’s a calling.<\/p>\n I’ve felt called before. The lords of the legal profession, however, have given me every indication that I’m not welcome in their domain. Nevertheless, I remain the kind of man who would not turn a deaf ear to a person who needs help and whom I believe I can help. I believe there’s nothing more noble in life. I am open to that call.<\/p>\n But if the phone doesn’t ring? If I’m not called?<\/p>\n