{"id":1388,"date":"2011-10-31T15:10:01","date_gmt":"2011-10-31T19:10:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.peoplevstate.com\/?p=1388"},"modified":"2011-11-13T14:10:38","modified_gmt":"2011-11-13T18:10:38","slug":"i-would-not-ignore-smith%e2%80%99s-plight-and-choose-her-case-as-a-fit-opportunity-to-teach-the-ninth-circuit-a-lesson","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.peoplevstate.com\/?p=1388","title":{"rendered":"“I would not ignore Smith\u2019s plight and choose her case as a fit opportunity to teach the Ninth Circuit a lesson.” (Updated)"},"content":{"rendered":"
Thus writes Justice Ginsburg, joined by Justices Sotomayor and Breyer, in their dissenting opinion in Cavazos v. Smith<\/a><\/em>, in which the majority summarily reversed a Ninth Circuit decision holding that no rational trier of fact could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was guilty of shaking her grandchild and causing his death in 1996. As a result of the majority’s decision, the grandmother, who has been free for the last five years, will now have to return to prison<\/a>.<\/p>\n The very fact that the presumably-rational Ninth Circuit judges found that no rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt should itself demonstrate to a rational mind that no rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt<\/em>. Even the majority on the SCOTUS admitted that “Doubts about whether Smith is in fact guilty are understandable.” If those doubts are understandable, they’re reasonable<\/em>.<\/p>\n A legal system worthy of respect would not limit the presumption of innocence to something we tell jurors they should think about, but would apply it across the board, in legislation<\/a>, and in judicial opinions<\/a>.<\/p>\n The dissenters essentially accuse the majority of Gratuitous Violence<\/a>.<\/p>\n The “law” is exposed again as a cruel and ugly monster.<\/p>\n