{"id":350,"date":"2009-10-29T17:22:09","date_gmt":"2009-10-29T21:22:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.peoplevstate.com\/?p=350"},"modified":"2009-10-29T17:22:09","modified_gmt":"2009-10-29T21:22:09","slug":"worlds-first-posthumous-guilty-plea","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.peoplevstate.com\/?p=350","title":{"rendered":"World’s First Posthumous Guilty Plea"},"content":{"rendered":"
Actually, I don’t know whether it’s the world’s first, but the situation is certainly, as this story<\/a> in the Elkhart Truth put it, “unusual.” The story’s headline declares: “Embattled optometrist Gabriele did give falsified diagnoses.” The trouble is, Dr. Philip Gabriele and his wife denied any wrongdoing in a suicide note<\/a> they mailed to a local TV station a couple days after they were indicted by a federal grand jury and before killing themselves. Shortly after the couple’s suicide, an ophthalmologist who was prepared to testify on their behalf, James Freeman, told the South Bend Tribune <\/a>that he was<\/p>\n “disappointed and surprised by the indictment.” Freeman said he didn’t know the Gabrieles but did review medical charts that the government claimed showed their culpability.<\/p>\n “From what I’ve seen and the charges I’ve seen, I’m surprised the prosecutors were willing to indict on this,” Freeman said. “I certainly did not see anything that constituted fraud. Things, at first glance, can look funny to somebody who doesn’t understand the medicine behind it.”<\/p>\n Still, it seemed the government was determined to press forward with the case after two years of work, Freeman said.<\/p>\n “I’m not saying [AUSA Donald Schmid] was acting in bad faith,” Freeman said. “He probably felt a crime was committed, but I just think he was wrong. I was prepared to come and testify about that, but unfortunately I won’t have that opportunity.”<\/p><\/blockquote>\n So what news justified the conclusion in the Elkhart “Truth”‘s headline that the Gabrieles were guilty? Well, a representative of a local bank appointed by the local circuit court to handle the Gabrieles’ estate and the corporation under which they’d operated their eye practice (dba the Gabriele Eye Institute) pled guilty on behalf of the corporation, even though the representative, according to the story, “had no personal knowledge of the events.”<\/p>\n