{"id":510,"date":"2010-07-10T11:39:51","date_gmt":"2010-07-10T15:39:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.peoplevstate.com\/?p=510"},"modified":"2010-07-10T14:29:40","modified_gmt":"2010-07-10T18:29:40","slug":"the-truth-will-set-you-free","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.peoplevstate.com\/?p=510","title":{"rendered":"The truth will set you free."},"content":{"rendered":"
I recently came across this article<\/a> at the Center for a Stateless Society by Anna Morgenstern, with which I generally agree. I particularly agree with the following explication of terms from the article:<\/p>\n So why the pretense? Why go through this ruse of \u201cpublic\u201d and \u201cprivate?\u201d Well that\u2019s it. That\u2019s the state. The state IS the ruse. The state \u2026 is a social fiction. It is the myth of legitimacy.\u00a0This myth is the thin black line that separates \u201cthe government\u201d and its \u201cprivate sector\u201d attachments from any other Mafia. The fact that people believe that \u201cthe government\u201d is legitimately allowed to kill and steal, and that when it does so, it represents something good and just, is what has allowed it to dominate the earth. And despite the secondary myth that the government exists to fight crime, it is the very existence of the government that allows the lesser Mafias to thrive.<\/p>\n In the past this myth of legitimacy was carried out through religion. As various religions were the \u201cprivate sector\u201d beneficiaries of government, they would preach that the state was the secular arm of their organization, devoted to enforcing \u201cthe lord\u2019s will\u201d on Earth.<\/p>\n While bunk in and of itself, at least they admitted the connection.<\/p>\n Nowadays, a new religion, that of \u201cdemocracy,\u201d legitimizes the state by claiming that it is \u201cthe people\u2019s will\u201d that they are charged with enforcing. (Even when the people seem to be quite against what the government is doing, ala the recent bank bailouts) Other flatulent high sounding ideas like \u201csocial order,\u201d\u00a0 \u201ctradition\u201d\u00a0and \u201cpublic goods\u201d are also used to weave this magic spell in people\u2019s heads.<\/p>\n So now that we know what the state is, we know what Anarchism is. Anarchism, truly, is simply the understanding that the state is merely a social fiction and has no legitimacy. When you live that truth, you will not follow the law simply because it is the law.\u00a0 You will let your conscience be your guide. At that point you are no longer being ruled, though you might have crimes committed against you by the \u201cgovernment\u201d and its lackeys. When the Mafia forces someone to pay protection money, that guy isn\u2019t being ruled, he\u2019s being robbed.<\/p>\n So what then is liberty? Liberty is the absence of crime. Real crime, crime that has a victim. Crimes that all persons\u2019 conscience would acknowledge as such. A libertarian then, is someone who wishes to abolish (or more realistically) minimize crime.<\/p>\n Not all anarchists are libertarians (some Stirnerites come to mind), but most are, at least to some extent.\u00a0 But all anarchists understand that no one has any special authority to commit crimes that no one else has.<\/p>\n All political theories involve some level of crime. Someone is getting victimized for someone else\u2019s benefit. The \u201cliberals\u201d (as we know them today) tend to favor a very mild, safe plutocratic regime \u2014 one that seeks to round off all of lifes sharp corners for the sake of making us all viable economic resources to exploit. The \u201cconservatives\u201d have a more dog-eat-dog approach in which the workers are set up to fight over ever more scarce resources; a Darwinian approach to maximizing our productivity.\u00a0Ultimately, these are just differing livestock management techniques.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n I suspect that even a highly authoritarian but also highly intelligent SCOTUS Justice like Antonin Scalia, who cited Lysander Spooner<\/a> in his Heller<\/em> opinion, recognizes in his heart of hearts the truth of anarchism, as set forth by Spooner with irrefutable logic in the first chapter (titled “What is Law?”<\/a>) of the work cited by Scalia and in his No Treason: The Constitution of no Authority<\/a>.<\/p>\n