People v. State

fairly undermining public confidence in the administration of justice
Subscribe

“Thirty years of experience have led me to believe that our job is in fact similar to the job of the prosecutors, namely, to do justice.”

November 29, 2009 By: John Kindley Category: Uncategorized

The quote in the title of this post is from this 2006 article by the then Chair of the Colorado Bar Association Criminal Law Section, Lenny Frieling. I cite the article because it reaches essentially the same conclusion as this blog post by a baby lawyer, which Scott Greenfield mocked here on a blog he calls “Simple Justice.” Scott’s view, you see, is that the duty of a criminal defense attorney is “not to ‘do justice,’ but to defend.” Scott goes so far as to proclaim, here and here, that anybody who doesn’t parrot his view in all its simplicity (me, for instance) shouldn’t be a criminal defense attorney.

Frieling, by contrast, takes a less dogmatic and hardheaded approach: “There also are many experienced and wise defense attorneys who would completely disagree with everything I’m saying. Sometimes I disagree with what I’m saying. I respectfully suggest that my view is helpful and at least should be considered in determining the role of a defense attorney.”

1 Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Sorry, but Justice is all there is | People v. State 31 07 10

Leave a Reply

*

  • "[T]here is just nothing wrong with telling the American people the truth." - Allen v. United States

  • Lysander Spooner

    Henry George

    Harriet Tubman

    Sitting Bull

    Angelus Silesius

    Smedley Butler

    Rose Wilder Lane

    Albert Jay Nock

    Dora Marsden

    Leo Tolstoy

    Henry David Thoreau

    John Brown

    Karl Hess

    Levi Coffin

    Max Stirner

    Dorothy Day

    Ernst Jünger

    Thomas Paine