People v. State

fairly undermining public confidence in the administration of justice
Subscribe

“Since the defendant was not present in court by choice, I do not believe he could legitimately be forced to profess a respect he did not feel.”

October 04, 2011 By: John Kindley Category: Judges

Alas, these are the concluding words of the dissent in In re Chase (7th Cir. 1972), found via this post by Eugene Volokh about a Muslim woman on trial in federal court for “allegedly funneling money to a terrorist group in Somali” who has been found in contempt of court and sentenced to 50 days in jail for refusing to rise when the judge entered the courtroom.

Leave a Reply

*

  • "[T]here is just nothing wrong with telling the American people the truth." - Allen v. United States

  • Lysander Spooner

    Henry George

    Harriet Tubman

    Sitting Bull

    Angelus Silesius

    Smedley Butler

    Rose Wilder Lane

    Albert Jay Nock

    Dora Marsden

    Leo Tolstoy

    Henry David Thoreau

    John Brown

    Karl Hess

    Levi Coffin

    Max Stirner

    Dorothy Day

    Ernst Jünger

    Thomas Paine